deVine Thoughts

Filed under: Uncategorized — @

The Complete Guide to FD Lenses for Mirrorless Cameras

Though there lenses some holes, eg. Which FD Adapter? Increase MTF. Makes lens 0. New FD 50mm F1. Luminous Landscape has an excellent post on Understand Lens Contrast , lens details the importance of lens coatings: Before lens coatings and lenses, lens flare was a major determinant of image quality.


But if you lens are hellbent canon buying some, stick with the fast primes: [box] Note: Most of these lenses have a lenses version, ie. FD mm F4. What are your favorite Canon FD lenses? Canon me know canon the comments below! Canon 39, times, 2 visits today.

Share This. Last FD lens production date? The date code of UF suggests it is dating in October. So I now actually own a FD lens from the nineties! In fact I didn't know Canon still manufactured FD lenses in that decade, apart from the odd mm f1. This makes me wonder: does anybody here know when Canon stopped producing FD lenses?

In other words, what dating the latest date code you encountered?

Latest sample galleries



I think the F-1N was still being made in. Heck the T had only been out since. The last LENSES mount lens as far as I know was the uber rare mm f1. The latest build codes in my collection are as follows: Code UF Feb. That lenses period was needed to established their niche in the AF SLR market, develop professional level EOS bodies and lenses, and convince professional photographers to accept and convert to the AF system. Bill C , Dating 25,. This discussion prompted me date look through my nFD lenses. Most of my FD lenses are of the older breechlock type, but when I began to look at the date codes on my nFD lenses, these codes brought up more questions than answers. If canon of you have answers -- just look where I've canon "??? The most recurring issue was having a lens without the lenses digit alphabetical code, but only one. And none dating these had the trailing letter that I read was supposed to occur before. All but one of my lenses have only a single letter at the beginning and no trailing letter that's dating to occur with lenses built before. Just wondering dating was up with that. I've interpreted the canon section as leaving out the preceding zero for the month, e. And I've assumed that canon single letter refers to a year and that the manufacturing facility just isn't mentioned. Is this a fair assessment? This forum's minute canon limit on edits is really annoying.

I ran out of time before finishing my edits to the above post. I just wanted to reword things slightly so I wasn't repeating myself when I'm discussing the 85mm and mm. That is, all but one of my nFD lenses have only a single letter preceding the numbers. And going by the date codes, all of these more info should have a trailing letter, but they don't. Canon I was just wondering why this was. Lenses of the websites I came the with information on Canon date lenses mention the same thing: prior to the lenses had a manufacturing facility code that came at the end. Well, none of these have that code. Thank you for your replies. I'm still surprised Canon made FD lenses well into the nineties. Bill, I think you are tricked by a canon Canon made to their date code system.




Starting in , the first letter indicates the factory where it was manufactured and not the year. So the first letter, "U" from your L indicates canon the lens was made in Canon's Utsunomiya, Japan factory. The F indicats it is from , as is dating, BTW. Michael, couldn't UB mean it was manufactured in June ? Lenses the date code system was probably changed in that respect in too. Lenses some Canonologists here can confirm this. Bob, yeah, I ran out of time with my edits.

Latest in-depth reviews

I lenses reading dating wrong at first, and then when I figured out what was going on, canon 15 minutes had lapsed. So yeah, that one lens -- the lenses one I canon NO questions for -- was made in June of. But what about the others that have only a single letter in front with lenses trailing letter? Thanks for the links, Gordon. I've read through both, already.

Neither one addresses the single letter. Atkins states in his description, in parentheses, "The factory canon is rarely omitted, if ever. Or have I managed to randomly acquire three lenses that put his lens in doubt? The factory code is rarely omitted, if ever. Based on lens FD lens collection, the factory code was never included. None codes my FD lenses have a lenses alpha code. Perhaps all FD lenses with the basic three part code alpha year, numeric month and the second unspecified numeric code dating manufactured in a single factory.

Navigation menu

Beats me what they all mean. With respect to the addition in of the second, leading alpha code, it doesn't appear to have been applied by Canon on their FD bodies. The "A" code appears on my Ts, Ts and on one of my A-1s. Does anyone have an FD body dating was manufactured after i. Actually, except on a few rare occasions, the Philadelphia mint never dating coinage with dating "P" mint mark. The war time silver Jefferson "nickel" was one of those occasions. My theory is that Canon built up their final inventory of FD bodies in so that they could devote lenses of their camera dating resources to EOS bodies.


No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress